BT cost on average 2.7 times what non-BT did and converted viewers into customers 2.4 times as well.  As the mathematically dexterous may notice immediately, this combination of numbers means that BT spend had a slightly lower ROI than non-BT spend.   I.e. BT was more effective, but not quite enough more to make up for its higher cost.

Répondre

Vous devez être connecté pour publier un commentaire Connexion »

© 2007 2010 par Ciblage Comportemental